- Index Page
- Anti-Crime Operations
- Two Hong Kong men arrested for involvement in “...
- Página Inicial
- Combate ao Crime
- Dois homens de HK detidos por burla telefónica “Adivi...
兩港男涉“猜猜我是誰”電話詐騙落網
2025年1月14日及15日，本局先後接獲兩名本澳居民檢舉，指1月13日在家中固網電話接獲自稱“女婿”及“兒子”的來電，對方稱因傷人急需現金賠償，稍後會有律師前來收款。兩名事主信以為真，於同日及翌日多次在住所和工作地點附近，以及前往香港將款項交給自稱“律師”及“律師助理”的男子，最終兩人分別損失35萬及31萬澳門元。
本澳資訊罪案調查處跟進調查，鎖定一名負責監視同黨收取騙款的首名涉案香港男子身份，並查悉其已逃離本澳。2025年1月16日，本局人員發現首名涉案香港男子再次入境本澳，隨即展開部署，最終在北區一大廈外拘捕剛收取第三名本澳事主6萬澳門元騙款的次名涉案香港男子，以及在附近監視的首名涉案香港男子。
經查，本局人員得悉第三名事主於2025年1月14日接獲同類詐騙電話，而兩名涉案男子則受香港電話詐騙犯罪集團指使來澳收取騙款及進行監視。
本局根據調查所得，以詐騙（相當巨額）罪及犯罪集團罪將兩名涉案男子移送檢察院偵辦，並繼續追緝其餘在逃涉案人及贓款下落。
Two Hong Kong men arrested for involvement in “Guess who I am” telephone scams
On 14th and 15th January 2025, the Judiciary Police successively received complaints from two local residents, claiming that on January 13th, they had received incoming phone calls on their fixed-lines at home from someone self-professed to be their “son-in-law” and “son”, who were in urgent need of cash due to bodily assault compensation, while lawyers would arrive later to collect the funds. The two unsuspecting victims handed over the funds to some men self-professed to be “lawyer” and “legal assistant”, on multiple occasions, in the vicinity of their residences, work places, and in Hong Kong on January 13th and 14th. In the end, the two victims lost MOP350,000 and MOP310,000 respectively.
The I.T. Crimes Division of the Judiciary Police followed-up on the investigation, and identified the first involved Hong Kong man who was responsible for monitoring his accomplices when collecting the fraud proceeds. It was also revealed that he had already fled Macao. The Judiciary Police discovered that the first involved Hong Kong man re-entered Macao on 16th January 2025, forthwith launched deployment, and arrested the second involved Hong Kong man, who had just collected MOP60,000 from the third local victim outside a residential building in Northern district, as well as the first involved Hong Kong man who was monitoring nearby.
Investigation revealed that the third victim had received scam calls of similar nature on 14th January 2025, while the involved duo had been instructed by a Hong Kong telephone scam syndicate to come to Macao for fraud proceeds collection and monitoring.
Based on investigative results, the Judiciary Police transferred the involved duo to the Public Prosecutions Office with the charges of fraud (considerably huge amount) and criminal syndicate, while continuing to pursue the remaining involved persons at large and the whereabouts of the illicit proceeds.
Dois homens de HK detidos por burla telefónica “Adivinha quem sou eu”
Em 14 e 15 de Janeiro de 2025, a PJ recebeu as queixas de dois residentes de Macau, indicando que, no dia 13, tinham recebido um telefonema, para a linha fixa de casa, onde um homem alegava ser o seu “genro” e “filho”, disse que precisava urgentemente de algum dinheiro para indemnizar as pessoas por agressão física, e que mais tarde iria chegar um advogado para recebê-lo. As vítimas acreditaram, no mesmo dia e no dia seguinte, entregaram dinheiro em ocasiões diferentes, tanto nos arredores do domicílio residencial e profissional como em Hong Kong, aos homens que alegavam ser “advogado” e “assistente do advogado”, por fim acabaram por sofrer um prejuízo de 350.000 e 310.000 patacas, respectivamente.
A Divisão de Investigação de Crimes Informáticos iniciou a investigação e identificou como suspeito um homem de Hong Kong que vigiava o cúmplice que recebia o dinheiro, apurando que o outro já tinha fugido de Macau. No dia 16 de Janeiro de 2025, o nosso pessoal verificou que o suspeito entrou de novo em Macau, assim efectuou uma operação que culminou na detenção de outro homem de HK, que acabava de receber 60.000 patacas da terceira vítima de Macau fora dum edifício da zona Norte, também foi detido o primeiro suspeito que estava a vigiar nas proximidades.
No interrogatório, apurou-se que a terceira vítima tinha atendido à chamada fraudulenta no dia 14, além disso, os dois homens confessaram que tinham sido contratados por um grupo de burla telefónica da região vizinha para receber o dinheiro das vítimas e fazer a vigilância em Macau.
Conforme o que foi apurado na investigação, os dois detidos foram presentes ao MP por burla (de valor consideravelmente elevado), enquanto que continuamos à procura de outros suspeitos em fuga e do dinheiro em causa.