- Index Page
- Anti-Crime Operations
- Case of bogus employment of non-resident worker ...
偵破假聘外僱案 拘三女
2026年10月14日，本局有組織罪案調查處在調查一宗涉嫌非法剝奪他人行動自由、普通傷害身體完整性及不法錄製品及照片的案件期間，揭發案中一名持外地僱員身份認別證的賣淫女子涉及虛假聘用，遂開立專案深入調查。
調查證實，涉案公司本澳東主透過中介人協助，收取6萬元人民幣作為辦理費用並假聘該名涉案內地女子，自2026年6月12日起虛報其任職商舖裝機員。該名涉案女子在取得外僱證件及開設發薪帳戶後，將銀行卡、密碼及4,000澳門元現金“月薪”交予涉案公司一名內地女職員轉交東主，由東主每月進行存取款操作以偽造發薪記錄。涉案女子取得留澳許可後從未到公司上班，並多次持外僱證件進出內地及澳門，留澳目的主要在賭場周邊範圍從事賣淫活動；涉案公司職員在明知情況下仍協同參與虛假辦理手續。
本局根據調查所得，以為取得許可而虛偽作出並主張某些法律行為罪，將涉案兩名內地女子及一名本澳公司東主移送檢察院偵辦，並繼續追查其餘涉案人士。
Case of bogus employment of non-resident worker cracked, with 3 women apprehended
On 14th October 2026, while investigating a case of deprivation of other’s freedom of movement, common assault causing harm to bodily integrity and illegal recordings and photographs, the Organised Crime Division of the Judiciary Police found that a prostitute holding Non-resident Worker’s Identity Card was involved in bogus employment, thus a specialised case file was opened for in-depth investigation.
Investigation confirmed that the local owner of the involved company had received RMB60,000 as the processing fee to falsely employ the involved mainland woman via the assistance of a middleman and had falsely reported her employment as the shop equipment installer since 12th June 2026. Having obtained the Non-resident Worker’s Identity Card and opened a payroll account, the involved woman gave the bank card, password, “monthly salary” of MOP4,000 in cash to a mainland female employee of the involved company to pass on to the owner, who would conduct monthly deposit and withdrawal transactions to forge payroll records. After obtaining the permit to stay in Macao, the involved woman never reported for work at the company, and had used the Non-resident Worker’s Identity Card to enter and exit the mainland and Macao on multiple occasions. The purpose of staying in Macao was to engage in prostitution activities at the peripheries of the casinos, while the employee of the involved company, who was fully aware of that, still collusively participated in the bogus processing procedures.
Based on investigative results, the Judiciary Police transferred the two involved mainland women and the owner of a local company to the Public Prosecutions Office for the offence of falsely performing and asserting certain legal acts to obtain permits, while continuing to pursue the remaining involved individuals.