司法警察局 Policia Judiciaria

三男女涉犯罪集團及相當巨額詐騙等罪被拘

2026年5月26日至9月22日期間，司警局先後接獲11名事主報案，稱被一名內地女子藉代購貨品詐騙，各人損失13.6萬至9,200萬澳門元不等，總損失約1.18億澳門元。

司警局經濟罪案調查處展開調查，查知涉案內地女子主要以三種方式行騙：

一、涉案內地女子以優惠價向從事代購的事主推介人蔘、冬蟲夏草或月餅等貨品，遊說事主轉售圖利。合作數次後，即有陌生“客戶”以通訊軟件向事主訂購相關貨品，且只付一半訂金，而涉案內地女子則要求事主支付全額貨款。由於利潤甚高，誘使事主自資代替“客戶”墊付另外一半的貨款。在數次少量交易並成功獲利後，“客戶”便會不斷加大訂購量，而涉案內地女子則拖延供貨，導致事主持續墊支貨款而無法即時取回本利；

二、涉案內地女子向親友聲稱有“客戶”訂購人蔘或月餅後突然取消交易，而自己有足夠資金承接該批貨品，並以高額利潤遊說親友投資，再由涉案內地女子轉售圖利。起初各人成功獲利，其後遭涉案內地女子以各種理由拖延；

三、涉案內地女子以大額折扣向經營實體超市或貿易行的事主出售月餅，再由一名本澳女同黨假扮“客戶”，到相關超市或貿易行訂購有關貨品，令事主覺得利潤可觀而大量進貨，涉案內地女子在收取貨款後即拖延供貨或退款。

調查顯示，涉案內地女子自2019年起一直以上述手段行騙，由於其過往確實從事代購業務並曾在本澳北區經營超市，與大部分事主稔熟，其間亦曾給予事主少量本利或貨品，因此多名事主對有關交易深信不疑並願意繼續出資，未有即時發現被騙。同時，本局人員亦發現騙款透過多個本澳銀行帳戶作轉移，有關帳戶持有人包括涉案內地女子及兩名涉案本澳男女。

2026年9月21日及22日，司警局人員在治安警察局協助下分別截獲涉案內地女子及涉案本澳女子，並於22日晚成功傳召涉案本澳男子到司警局助查，在三人身上合共檢獲4部手機。

經查，案中從未露面的所謂“客戶”及“訂貨”均為兩名涉案女子所假扮及虛構。此外，騙款中至少約3,000萬澳門元已被轉至內地不明銀行帳戶，另有約2,000萬澳門元則用作發放本利及其他用途。

司警局根據調查所得，以詐騙（相當巨額）、清洗黑錢及犯罪集團等罪將三名涉案男女移送檢察院偵辦。

Three individuals arrested for offences including criminal syndicate and fraud of considerably huge amount

Between 26th May and 22nd September 2026, the Judiciary Police successively received reports from 11 victims, alleging that they had been defrauded by a Mainland woman under the pretext of surrogate purchase of merchandise. Each of them suffered losses ranging from MOP136,000 to MOP92 million, with a total loss of approximately MOP118 million.

The Economic Crimes Division of the Judiciary Police initiated investigation and found that the involved Mainland woman mainly committed fraud in three ways:

1. The involved Mainland woman promoted merchandise including ginseng, Chinese caterpillar fungus or mooncakes to the victim, who was engaged in surrogate procurement, offering them at discounted prices and persuading the victim to resell for profit. Following several collaborations, an unfamiliar “customer” began placing orders for the relevant merchandise from the victim via a messaging app, paying only half of the deposit, while the involved Mainland woman demanded that the victim pay the full purchase price. Tempted by the high profits, the victim advanced the remaining half of the payment on behalf of the “customer.” After several small-scale transactions that successfully yielded profits, the “customer” continuously increased the order quantities, yet the involved Mainland woman delayed the delivery of the merchandise, causing the victim to continuously advance the payments without being able to promptly recover both the principal and profit;

2. The involved Mainland woman claimed to her relatives and friends that a “customer” had placed an order for ginseng or mooncakes but suddenly cancelled the transaction, and alleged that she had sufficient funds to take over the batch of merchandise. The involved Mainland woman persuaded her relatives and friends to invest by promising high profits, after which she would resell the merchandise for profit. Initially, the victims successfully yielded profits, yet the involved Mainland woman subsequently delayed payments using various pretexts;

3. The involved Mainland woman sold mooncakes at substantial discounts to the victims operating brick-and-mortar supermarkets or trading firms. A female accomplice from Macao then posed as a “customer” and placed orders for the merchandise at the relevant supermarkets or trading firms, thereby leading the victims to believe that the transactions were highly profitable and hence purchased large quantities of the merchandise. Upon receiving the payments, the involved Mainland woman delayed the delivery of the merchandise or the refund of the payments.

Investigation revealed that the involved Mainland woman had been committing fraud employing the aforementioned modi operandi since 2019. As she had previously engaged in surrogate procurement business and had operated a supermarket in the Northern District of Macao, she was well-acquainted with most of the victims. During the course, she also provided the victims with small amounts of principal and profit, or merchandise. As a result, a number of victims were convinced of the related transactions and willing to continue investing, failing to immediately realise that they had been defrauded. Meanwhile, the Judiciary Police personnel also discovered that the fraud proceeds had been transferred through multiple bank accounts in Macao, whose holders included the involved Mainland woman and two other involved individuals (one man and one woman) from Macao.

On 21st and 22nd September 2026, the Judiciary Police personnel intercepted the involved Mainland woman and the involved Macao woman respectively with the assistance of the Public Security Police Force, and successfully summoned the involved Macao man to the Judiciary Police for assistance in investigation on the night of September 22nd. A total of 4 mobile phones were seized from the three individuals.

Investigation revealed that the so-called “customers” in the case that never appeared in person and “placing orders”, were all impersonated and fabricated by the two involved women. In addition, at least approximately MOP30 million of the fraud proceeds had been transferred to unidentified bank accounts in Mainland, while another sum of approximately MOP20 million was used to pay out principal and profit, as well as for other purposes.

Based on the investigative findings, the Judiciary Police transferred the three involved individuals to the Public Prosecutions Office for investigation on charges including fraud (considerably huge amount), money laundering and criminal syndicate.