- Index Page
- Anti-Crime Operations
- Judiciary Police busting telephone fraud case “...
- Página Inicial
- Combate ao Crime
- Resolvido um caso de burla telefónica “Adivinha quem ...
司警局偵破“猜猜我是誰”電話詐騙案 拘兩港婦
2024年4月17日,本澳女事主家中固網電話收到自稱“女婿”的來電,對方稱因傷人被捕,需賠償10萬澳門元,着女事主準備現金並將事件保密。女事主信以為真,同日中午在住所附近將款項交予假冒律師助手的涉案香港女子後各自離去。同日稍後時間,“女婿”再次來電,以傷者需進行手術及住院為由再向女事主索取30萬澳門元。女事主起疑,向家人確認後始知遇騙,遂報警求助。
本局資訊罪案調查處人員展開部署,於涉案香港女子接觸女事主準備交收款項時即場將其拘捕,並成功在現場附近拘捕正準備逃走的另一名涉案香港女子。
經查,兩名涉案香港女子供稱受犯罪集團安排來澳,假冒律師助手向女事主收取款項。此外,本局查悉兩人於當日以相同手法騙取一名本澳男事主5萬澳門元,即兩宗案件的兩名事主合共損失15萬澳門元,而兩名涉案香港女子從中獲得18,000澳門元報酬。行動中本局人員成功起回15萬澳門元贓款。
本局根據調查所得,以詐騙(巨額)罪及犯罪集團罪將兩名涉案香港女子移送檢察院偵辦。
Judiciary Police busting telephone fraud case “Guess Who I am”, nabbing two Hong Kong women
On 17th April 2024, a Macao female victim received a call from someone who self-claimed to be her “son-in-law” via landline telephone at home. The other party claimed that, he had been arrested for wounding someone, and had to pay MOP100,000 as compensation. He then asked the female victim to get the cash ready and keep mum about the incident. Believing it to be true, at noon on the same day, the female victim handed the money to the involved Hong Kong woman who was disguised as a paralegal in the vicinity of her residence. The duo parted ways afterwards. Sometime later on the same day, the “son-in-law” gave her a call again. On the pretext that the injured person needed an operation and was hospitalised, he asked her for MOP300,000 again. Sensing that something went fishy, the woman came to realise that she had been defrauded upon confirmation with her family, thus reporting to the police for assistance forthwith.
Personnel of the IT Crimes Division of the Judiciary Police launched a deployment, and had the involved Hong Kong woman nabbed at the scene as she came into contact with the female victim who was about to hand in the money, whilst successfully apprehending another involved Hong Kong woman in the vicinity of the site who was about to flee.
Upon investigation, two involved Hong Kong women confessed that, they had been arranged to come to Macao by the criminal syndicate, posing as paralegals to collect money from the female victim. In addition, the Judiciary Police learnt from investigation that, the duo had defrauded a Macao man of MOP50,000 with the same modus operandi on that day. In other words, the two victims of the two cases suffered a loss of MOP150,000 in total, whilst the two involved Hong Kong women received MOP18,000 as remuneration from these incidents. During the operation, personnel of the Judiciary Police recovered ill-gotten gains of MOP150,000 successfully.
Based on investigative findings, the Judiciary Police transferred the two involved Hong Kong women to the Public Prosecutions Office for the offences of fraud (huge amount) and criminal syndicate.
Resolvido um caso de burla telefónica “Adivinha quem sou eu” e detidas duas mulheres de Hong Kong
No dia 17 de Abril de 2024, a vítima, uma residente de Macau, recebeu um telefonema, para a linha fixa de casa, de um homem que alegava ser o seu “genro”, que dizia que foi detido pela polícia por agressão e que tinha de pagar uma indemnização de 100.000 patacas, e pedia à vitima que preparasse dinheiro e mantivesse o incidente em segredo. A vítima acreditou que era verdade e entregou o dinheiro a uma mulher de Hong Kong que fingia ser a assistente de um advogado, perto da sua casa, ao meio-dia, e depois as duas saíram separadamente. Mais tarde, no mesmo dia, o “genro” voltou a telefonar e exigiu-lhe mais 300.000 patacas, com o pretexto de que o ferido necessitava de cirurgia e internamento. A vítima desconfiou e, depois de confirmar com a família, apercebeu-se de que tinha sido burlada e fez queixa à polícia para pedir ajuda.
O pessoal da Divisão de Investigação de Crimes Informáticos iniciou a investigação, deteve a mulher de Hong Kong no local quando esta entrou em contacto com a vítima para receber o dinheiro. Uma outra mulher de Hong Kong foi também detida perto do local quando estava tentar de fugir.
No interrogatório as duas detidas confessaram que tinham sido contratadas por uma rede criminosa para vir a Macau, deviam fingir ser assistentes de um advogado e receber o dinheiro da vítima. Além disso, a PJ apurou que as duas tinham também burlado um homem de Macau, em 50.000 patacas, com o mesmo modus operandi, no mesmo dia, ou seja, as duas vítimas nos dois casos sofreram um prejuízo total de 150.000 patacas, por isto as duas detidas obtiveram 18.000 patacas como remuneração. Na operação, o nosso pessoal conseguiu recuperar 150.000 patacas do dinheiro burlado.
Conforme o que foi apurado na investigação, as duas detidas foram presentes ao Ministério Público por burla (valor elevado) e associação criminosa.